Gods and Mortals: The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of the DCEU

“You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” - Harvey Dent

That line — meant for Gotham — might as well be carved into the stone of the DC Extended Universe itself.

From Batman Begins (2005) to Superman (2025), Warner Bros. and DC have walked a twenty–year tightrope between artistry and commerce, myth and management, chaos and rebirth. It’s a story that feels less like a timeline of films and more like a myth of its own — a pantheon of gods squabbling behind the scenes, each director and executive a Zeus or Hades of their own realm, trying to control lightning in a bottle.

It begins, appropriately, in darkness.

I. The Fire Rises — Nolan’s Shadow and the Birth of Modern Superhero Realism

Everything starts with Batman Begins in 2005 — though technically, that film wasn’t part of the DCEU at all. Christopher Nolan didn’t care about “shared universes” or post-credit teases. He cared about cinema. And somehow, that made Batman Begins revolutionary.

Gone were the campy Dutch angles and toy-commercial sheen of the ’90s Batman & Robin. In came realism, consequence, psychology. Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne wasn’t a superhero — he was a trauma survivor wrapped in Kevlar and guilt.

The trilogy — Batman Begins (2005), The Dark Knight (2008), and The Dark Knight Rises (2012) — redefined what a superhero movie could be. The Dark Knight earned over a billion dollars worldwide and a posthumous Oscar for Heath Ledger’s Joker. Critics hailed it as “the Godfather of comic-book movies.”

Nolan turned Batman into a vocabulary test for the industry: if you could make a superhero movie that mattered to critics — that could win awards and lodge itself in the cultural brain — then everything changed. Nolan’s success didn’t create the DCEU, but it created the measure by which many future DC attempts were judged. Executives learned a lesson in two parts: comics characters could be prestige, and darkness could equal seriousness. That lesson would prove seductive and poisonous in roughly equal measures.

That lesson would become both a guiding light and a curse.

As Marvel built its shared universe under Kevin Feige with Iron Man (2008) — optimistic, interlinked, fast-moving — DC’s executives wanted their own mythos. But instead of humor and color, they chased gravitas. They wanted art. They wanted Nolan.

What they got was Zack Snyder.

II. A God Falls to Earth — The Snyder Years

If Nolan built myth into realism, Snyder built realism into myth.

Leading up to the creation and production of Man of Steel (2013), Zack Snyder had established himself as a visually distinctive filmmaker known for stylized, graphic-novel-inspired storytelling. His major works before Man of Steel included:

• Dawn of the Dead (2004): A well-received remake that proved Snyder could deliver intense, kinetic action with strong visual flair.

• 300 (2006): A massive commercial hit adapted from Frank Miller’s graphic novel, praised for its groundbreaking use of digital backdrops and stylized violence.

• Watchmen (2009): A visually faithful but polarizing adaptation of the classic Alan Moore comic. While some admired its ambition and accuracy, others criticized it as overly dark and inaccessible for mainstream audiences.

• Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole (2010) and Sucker Punch (2011): The latter especially hurt Snyder’s reputation among critics, who saw it as visually striking but narratively weak.

Man of Steel (2013) was less a movie than a manifesto. Snyder’s Superman was not the smiling boy scout; he was a lonely god among men. Cavill’s Clark Kent wrestled with existential purpose, not just villains. The visuals were grand, the tone operatic, the collateral damage biblical. It was a cinematic sermon about alienation, divinity, and destruction. It looked spectacular — sunlight refracting off shattered skyscrapers, Jesus imagery everywhere — but it split audiences in half.

To some, it was visionary.

To others, it was joyless.

Audiences were divided. Critics called it “beautiful but joyless.” Warner Bros., however, saw dollar signs — and a potential rival to the growing Marvel machine. Rather than build slowly, they decided to sprint. Hoping to catch up to Marvel.

Warner Bros. executives were initially enthusiastic about Snyder’s vision, especially his promise to modernize Superman for contemporary audiences and to establish a foundation for a shared DC cinematic universe. However, after production and early screenings, reactions within the studio were mixed. Executives were impressed by the film’s visuals and scope but concerned about its somber tone and the destruction-heavy climax. While Man of Steel performed solidly at the box office (earning over $660 million worldwide), it divided critics and audiences — and Warner Bros. took note of both the financial success and the controversy around its darker interpretation of Superman when shaping their future DC plans.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) came out the same year as Captain America Civil War, the 13th film of the MCU. Yet DC tried to do what Marvel had taken years to perfectly, carefully do: pit its biggest icons against each other while launching an entire shared universe. It introduced Ben Affleck’s older, weary Batman and Gal Gadot’s luminous Wonder Woman alongside Jesse Eisenburg as Lex Luthor, and a monster that was a version of Doomsday. Yet the film felt burdened by expectation, a clash of gods that left humanity — and coherence — behind. It opened huge, then cratered. Critics called it incoherent; fans defended it like scripture. The debate was passionate, polarizing — and exhausting.

Snyder’s film had grand ambitions. Beyond the titular showdown between Batman (Ben Affleck) and Superman (Henry Cavill), Dawn of Justice attempted to introduce a darker, more mature tone that set DC apart from Marvel’s lighter fare. It sought to explore themes of power, accountability, and fear in the face of godlike strength. The idea of a paranoid Bruce Wayne preparing for war against an alien savior carried genuine narrative weight — until it was buried under the pressure of franchise setup.

Warner Bros., eager to catch up to Marvel’s interconnected success, pushed Snyder’s film to fast-track multiple threads. Instead of letting the Batman-Superman conflict breathe, the movie stuffed in teases for Justice League, introduced Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot), and even shoehorned cameos for future heroes like The Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg — all via a single email file. I And not to mention...The Death of Superman.

t was less organic storytelling and more corporate checklist. Reports of studio interference and last-minute cuts (the infamous “Ultimate Edition” later restored over 30 minutes of story) only confirmed what audiences sensed: this was a film fighting itself.

Batman v Superman was visually stunning, operatic, and full of potential, but the pacing and tone collapsed under the strain of setup. Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) plotted vaguely, Doomsday appeared as a CGI afterthought, and Superman’s death — meant to be emotionally resonant — landed flat because the universe around him hadn’t been built yet. The film tried to tell three movies’ worth of story in one sitting, and the result was narrative overload.

In hindsight, Dawn of Justice stands as both a bold experiment and a cautionary tale. It showcased Snyder’s visual flair and thematic ambition while exposing the dangers of cinematic universes built on studio mandates instead of patience. While later DCEU films like Wonder Woman and Aquaman would find more stable footing, Batman v Superman remains the franchise’s defining moment — the film that tried to build a world before it had a foundation.

At that moment, the DCEU split into two halves: the filmmaker’s vision and the studio’s fear.

III. Squad Goals and Amazons — Light Finds a Way

David Ayer’s script for Suicide Squad and initial assembly emphasized damaged people, a gritty mood, and a traditional score. The theatrical release, however, foregrounded bombastic production design, a pop soundtrack and quippy beats — marketing leaned hard into Harley/Deadshot/Joker imagery and a jokey vibe that didn’t match the darker moments in the film. That mismatch is a central source of the film’s critical backlash. EW.com+1

It is almost impossible to discuss the DCEU without going into studio intervention, and this is one of the more well known, infamous examples that MUST be explored to set up how Warner Bros. failed to learn from their lessons.

The key areas of studio meddling and recutting

1. Major trims / alternate edit(s). Ayer and others have said a much longer, more coherent “Ayer cut” exists — allegedly with roughly ~40–50 minutes of different/extra material — and that the theatrical version was substantially reworked by the studio and outside editors. Ayer has described his version as a fully finished, dramatically different edit with a traditional score; Warner repeatedly stated publicly there were no plans to release that cut. Vanity Fair+1

2. Tone shift (darker → lighter/comedic). After the backlash to Batman v Superman, studio executives pushed for a lighter, more crowd-pleasing tone (and apparently wanted to avoid another “gritty” failure). That led to new editorial choices and even some reshoots and re-framing to emphasize humor, spectacle and one-liners. Ayer himself has said the released version felt like the studio tried to make “a f---ing comedy.” EW.com+1

3. Music and sound: pop songs replaced score. Ayer says his cut featured Steven Price’s original score; the theatrical release layered in contemporary pop/rock tracks (many used in marketing), which altered rhythm and emotional beats in dozens of scenes. Critics often call out the “radio songs” as clashing with darker character moments. SYFY

4. Joker material cut / character sidelined. Jared Leto reportedly shot a sizable amount of Joker material; a lot of that footage never made the final cut (only ~15 minutes of Joker material appears in the theatrical cut). Studio decisions and trimming meant the Joker’s presence felt tokenistic and fragmented — useful for marketing but not for character development. variety.com+1

5. Editing team / outside hands. Ayer has said the work on his cut was built on edits by Lee Smith and John Gilroy and that the studio later “ripped” the movie apart; multiple editors and post-production decisions changed structure, pacing and the placement of scenes, creating discontinuities critics noticed. SYFY+1

6. Test screenings and marketing pressure. Reported test screening reactions and a desire to match the tone of commercially successful R-rated comedies (e.g., Deadpool influence) pushed the studio toward recuts and reshoots emphasizing humor and spectacle. Marketing itself framed the film in a way that demanded a lighter tone in trailers, which then created a mismatch with some darker sequences left in the film. Screen Rant+1

Concrete differences reportedly present in the Ayer cut (based on Ayer's and crew comments)

• Longer runtime with fuller character arcs (notably for Enchantress, Killer Croc and the Squad members).

• Less pop music, full Steven Price orchestral score to support emotional beats.

• More Joker scenes and more sustained, darker moments with Harley that explain motivations.

• A different third act/closure — Ayer claims a solid resolution was trimmed or reworked in the theatrical edit.These claims come from Ayer, editors and multiple reporters; Warner has denied plans to release that cut, though James Gunn (later in charge of DC Studios) has told Ayer the cut “will have its time to be shared,” leaving the possibility ambiguous. SYFY+1

How the studio changes affected the final movie — analysis

• Tone inconsistency = emotional whiplash. Swapping out score for pop tracks and inserting jokier edits undercut dramatic tension. When a film moves repeatedly between grim psychological material and MTV-style montage, the audience can’t settle on how to feel — producing the “disjointed” criticism Suicide Squad received. EW.com

• Characters lost to compression. Cuts and rearranged scenes flattened arcs: villains feel schematic rather than having earned transformation. Joker’s truncation turned him into a marketing prop rather than an integrated antagonist. Business Insider

• Marketing/expectation mismatch. Trailers promised a neon, kinetic antihero movie; the theatrical film contained genuine attempts at pathos that the marketing didn’t prepare audiences for, creating cognitive dissonance and harsher reactions. Screen Rant

• Performance & craft still partly praised. Despite the problems, many performances (Margot Robbie’s Harley, Viola Davis’ Waller, Will Smith’s Deadshot) and certain production elements were singled out as working well — which suggests editing choices, not the raw material or acting, are central to what went wrong. Vanity Fair

What’s reliable vs. what’s speculative

• Reliable: public statements by David Ayer, Jared Leto, editors and studio spokespeople, plus contemporaneous reporting about Joker footage and pop soundtrack use. variety.com+1

• Less certain/speculative: exact minute-for-minute differences between Ayer’s cut and the theatrical film (only a handful of people have reportedly seen the Ayer cut), and whether releasing it would definitively “fix” reception — we can infer improvements (tone consistency, fuller arcs) but not guarantee critical success. SYFY+1

Bottom line

Suicide Squad (2016) is a clear case study in how studio editing, rescoring and marketing can reshape (and sometimes fracture) a director’s intended film. The theatrical product’s tonal mismatch and truncated arcs track directly to the post-production choices Warner made — choices the director and some cast have publicly disputed. Whether the “Ayer cut” would rewrite the film’s reputation is unproven, but the documented changes (trimmed Joker scenes, swapped score, lighter tonal edits, restructured third act) explain why so many viewers found the released movie emotionally incoherent. EW.com+2Screen Rant+2

Then came Wonder Woman (2017), the first unequivocal triumph of the DCEU. Patty Jenkins’ direction brought heart, hope, and humanity. Set amid World War I, it felt mythic and intimate at once. Gal Gadot became a global icon, and for a moment, DC seemed unstoppable again. Wonder Woman marked a major turning point for the DC Extended Universe (DCEU). Following the darker tone and mixed reception of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad, it was the first DCEU film to receive widespread critical acclaim and box office success. It demonstrated that DC could produce films with heart, hope, and universal appeal, helping to stabilize the franchise and pave the way for future solo projects. The film also elevated Wonder Woman as a central figure within the DCEU and became a cultural milestone for representation and gender equality in superhero cinema.

That illusion would last only a few months.

IV. The League of Justice

Justice League (2017) should have been DC’s Avengers moment. Instead, it became a cautionary tale for an entire industry.

Zack Snyder originally shot the film according to a darker, more somber DCEU tone established in Man of Steel and Batman v Superman. Snyder assembled a script that leaned into epic visuals, a brooding Superman arc, and a Cyborg-centric subplot. Wikipedia+1

Snyder’s original concept for Justice League was part of a multi-film arc inspired by Injustice and Knightmare storylines, with a darker tone and a mythic scope. His version delved into themes of gods and humanity, the corruption of Superman, and the looming threat of Darkseid. Principal photography began in April 2016, with Chris Terrio co-writing the screenplay.

Early reports suggested that Snyder was working under tight studio oversight, with Warner Bros. executives demanding changes to make the film more “fun” and concise after BvS. The studio mandated a runtime under two hours, significant tonal adjustments, and removal of setup for future sequels.

Midway through production, Snyder stepped away following the death of his daughter. Warner Bros. brought in Joss Whedon — fresh off his Marvel success — to finish the film. Whedon added new sequences, injected more humor and lighter tone, and supervised a considerable round of post-production changes. The result was a Frankenstein’s monster: Snyder’s heavy tone mixed with forced jokes, half-rendered CGI, and the now-infamous “Superman mustache” debacle.

During reshoots for Justice League, Cavill, who played Superman, was also filming Mission: Impossible – Fallout, where he sported a mustache required for his role as the villain August Walker.

When Justice League needed last-minute reshoots under Joss Whedon, Paramount (the studio behind Mission: Impossible) refused to let Cavill shave it off, fearing continuity issues. Warner Bros. had no choice but to digitally remove the mustache in post-production — leading to the infamous “CGI upper lip” that fans instantly noticed (and mocked) upon the film’s release.

The film bombed critically and financially. Critics described the film as tonally inconsistent, “Frankensteined” between two incompatible visions. The mix of Snyder’s operatic visuals and Whedon’s forced levity led to what many saw as a disjointed, unfinished product. Fans were also disappointed by the lack of depth and the absence of Snyder’s darker narrative arcs.

Financially, Justice League was considered a major failure for Warner Bros. — earning less than Man of Steel, BvS, and Wonder Woman despite featuring the full Justice League roster for the first time on film. $657 million worldwide — a poor result given its estimated $300 million budget (including reshoots and marketing).

Fans called it hollow; executives called it “course correction.” The damage, however, was deeper.

Ray Fisher (Cyborg) later alleged “abusive and unprofessional” behavior from Whedon on set, and claimed Warner executives ignored his complaints. WarnerMedia launched an independent investigation and later announced it had concluded and that “remedial action” had been taken, but published few substantive details. The episode generated further reporting, denials, and public disputes involving cast members and studio figures. variety.com+2variety.com+2

During production, reports surfaced that Gadot clashed with Whedon over how Wonder Woman was being portrayed.

According to Gadot, Whedon’s behavior on set was “unacceptable,” and she stood up to him after he allegedly made threats about damaging her career. She refused to film certain scenes she felt were sexist and inconsistent with the character’s values established in Wonder Woman. Warner Bros. later investigated, and Gadot received widespread praise for speaking out and setting boundaries in a notoriously difficult production.

Enter Walter Hamada

Walter Hamada, a longtime New Line Cinema executive known for his success with low-cost, high-profit horror films (The Conjuring, It, Annabelle), was appointed President of DC Films in January 2018 following the disastrous rollout of Justice League (2017). Warner Bros. wanted a steady hand to restore credibility and profitability to the DC brand after years of tonal inconsistency, executive interference, and critical backlash.

Successes

1. Stabilizing DC’s Production Pipeline Hamada focused on creating a more organized, filmmaker-driven approach rather than chasing Marvel’s shared-universe formula. He encouraged self-contained stories that could still exist loosely within the same world.

2. Critical and Commercial Hits

   • Aquaman (2018) became DC’s biggest financial success, grossing over $1 billion worldwide.

   • Shazam! (2019) was well-reviewed for its humor and heart, showing that DC could do lighter films successfully.

   • Joker (2019), though technically outside the DCEU, was greenlit under Hamada’s broader DC oversight; it became a cultural phenomenon and earned $1 billion+ and 11 Oscar nominations (including a win for Joaquin Phoenix).

   • The Batman (2022), another standalone, was praised for its gritty realism and strong box office performance.

3. Improved Studio Relations with Filmmakers Hamada’s approach attracted creative talents like Matt Reeves (The Batman), James Gunn (The Suicide Squad), and Todd Phillips (Joker), marking a shift from the heavily micromanaged Snyder-era environment.

Failures

1. Lack of a Cohesive Universe Vision Despite successes, Hamada struggled to define a clear narrative or tonal direction for the DCEU. Films like Birds of Prey (2020) and Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) had uneven receptions, and the franchise lacked the interconnected strength of Marvel’s model.

2. Controversial Cancellations and Confusion His era was marked by mixed messaging — projects like The Flash faced years of delays and off-screen controversies, while the cancellation of Batgirl (2022) (under Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav but during Hamada’s leadership) caused public backlash and frustration among filmmakers.

3. Fan Division and the “Snyderverse” Conflict Hamada’s tenure was overshadowed by the ongoing “Restore the SnyderVerse” movement. Despite Zack Snyder’s Justice League (2021) winning fan praise, Hamada resisted continuing Snyder’s storylines, which alienated part of the DC fanbase.

4. Leadership Instability and Departure The merger between Warner Bros. and Discovery in 2022 led to corporate restructuring. Hamada reportedly clashed with new leadership over direction and strategy — especially after Batgirl’s cancellation — and resigned in October 2022.

And then came the movement.

A vocal campaign (#ReleaseTheSnyderCut) pressed WarnerMedia to make Snyder’s original version available.

IV.5 The Snyderverse's Return

To take a short detour out of chronological order, the Snyder Cut of Justice League became one of the biggest fan campaigns in Hollywood history. Often times leading to internet harassment, protests, and boycotts that showed the toxic side of fandom.

Here is a overly simplified timeline of how we got here just for context:

During Justice League’s post-production, Snyder’s daughter, Autumn, took her own life. Faced with an unbearable loss, Snyder and his wife, producer Deborah Snyder, stepped away from the project.

At the same time, Warner Bros. was growing uneasy with Snyder’s tone. They wanted something lighter, faster, and more crowd-pleasing. Enter Joss Whedon — fresh off The Avengers — who was brought in to “finish” the movie.

What followed was a massive retooling: reshoots, rewritten scenes, brightened color grading, and a drastically shorter runtime. The final product, released in 2017, felt like two films awkwardly sewn together. Fans noticed. Critics panned it. Even the cast seemed subdued on the press tour.

Then came the whispers. Somewhere in studio vaults, fans believed, existed Snyder’s original version — untouched, unfiltered, and unseen. They called it The Snyder Cut.

What started as a niche online theory became a global movement. Hashtags like #ReleaseTheSnyderCut flooded social media daily. Fans bought Times Square billboards, funded ads on buses, and even hired a plane to fly a banner over Comic-Con. What made it different was how they paired activism with empathy: many campaigns raised money for suicide prevention in Autumn Snyder’s name.

This wasn’t just about a movie anymore — it was about justice for a director who’d lost control of his art, and for fans who felt robbed of a cohesive vision.

When Warner Bros. launched HBO Max in 2020, they needed content — and suddenly, the impossible became practical. After years of dismissing the idea, the studio greenlit Zack Snyder’s Justice League as a streaming exclusive.

Snyder didn’t just dust off old footage. He re-edited the entire film from the ground up, restoring cut storylines, character arcs, and visual tone. He completed unfinished visual effects, added new music, and even shot a few extra scenes (including Jared Leto’s “We live in a society” Joker moment).

The result: a four-hour epic released in March 2021 — a cinematic catharsis that felt more like a director’s resurrection than a simple re-release.

The Snyder Cut was widely praised as a massive improvement over the 2017 version. Critics noted that characters like Cyborg finally had emotional depth. The film felt coherent, majestic, and unmistakably Snyder.

But it was also the end of an era. Warner Bros. made it clear there were no plans to continue Snyder’s version of the DC universe. The DCEU was being reset under new leadership (eventually James Gunn and Peter Safran), and Snyder’s apocalyptic “Knightmare” future — the one teased in his film’s final act — was left unfinished.

Still, fans weren’t ready to let go. The hashtag evolved into a new rallying cry: #RestoreTheSnyderVerse. They wanted sequels, spin-offs, more Ben Affleck Batman, and more Henry Cavill Superman. And while the movement remained passionate, the studio had moved on.

Snyder envisioned a five-film arc centered on Superman’s moral journey — from alien outsider to hopeful savior.

• The saga would include:

  1. Man of Steel (2013)

  2. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

  3. Justice League Part 1

  4. Justice League Part 2

  5. Justice League Part 3 (finale)

• The overarching theme: "The fall and rise of Superman", culminating in his role as humanity’s unifying force.

Justice League (Original Snyder Plan)

Justice League Part 1

• The team forms in the wake of Superman’s death.

• Steppenwolf’s invasion leads to the team uniting, guided by Lois and Bruce.

• Superman returns late in the story — conflicted and emotionally reborn.

• Ends on a cliffhanger: the League defeats Steppenwolf, but Darkseid appears through a Boom Tube, setting up the cosmic war.

• Lois Lane is revealed to be pregnant — the emotional core of the sequel.

Justice League Part 2

• Darkseid launches a full-scale invasion of Earth.

• Lex Luthor teams up with Darkseid, providing inside knowledge about the heroes.

• The League is overwhelmed — Superman fails to protect Lois (killed by Darkseid), driving him to succumb to the Anti-Life Equation.

• The Knightmare future comes to pass: Darkseid conquers Earth, Superman becomes his enforcer.

• The few surviving heroes (Batman, Flash, Cyborg, Mera, Deadshot) form a resistance.

Justice League Part 3 (Finale)

• The remaining heroes execute a plan to send Flash back in time (the “Flashpoint”-style sequence teased in BvS) to prevent Lois’s death.

• Bruce sacrifices himself to save Lois — altering history.

• Superman resists Darkseid’s control, leading to a final cosmic battle on Earth and Apokolips.

• Darkseid is defeated; Earth is saved.

• Lois gives birth to Bruce Kent, raised as the son of Superman and Lois, symbolizing the union of hope and sacrifice.

• The arc ends decades later with Bruce Kent becoming the next Batman — fulfilling Snyder’s theme of legacy and rebirth.

V. The Elseworlds and the Crisis of Identity

Even as the DCEU proper wobbled, other filmmakers quietly redefined DC’s cinematic potential.

James Wan’s Aquaman intentionally embraced a brighter, swashbuckling, fantasy-adventure tone — lots of color, spectacle, and sea-epic setpieces — rather than the grim, mythic realism of Man of Steel or Batman v Superman. That tonal recalibration was a strategic attempt by Warner Bros. to broaden audience appeal and produce a crowd-pleasing tentpole built around visual spectacle. Wan leaned into comicbook excess (giant sea-creatures, ornate Atlantis architecture) and action choreography that favored momentum and setpiece spectacle. fxguide+1

At the time of release Aquaman did not suffer the kind of production controversy that dogged other DCEU entries (e.g., the Justice League director changes). James Wan’s production was broadly seen as a more coherent auteur-driven single-director film, which helped critical/audience clarity. Wikipedia

Aquaman showed Warner Bros. that investing in a bold visual identity and an audience-friendly lead could pay off commercially even when a character had previously been considered a weaker box-office draw. That encouraged the studio to greenlight sequels and rethink potential character centricity. Wikipedia

When Titans hit the screen in 2018, it promised a darker, tougher take on the beloved Teen Titans mythos — and it delivered. But beyond the action and new-costumes, the series’ journey offers a fascinating glimpse into streaming upheaval, brand shifts at Warner Bros./DC Entertainment, and how (or if) it ties into the larger DC cinematic puzzle.

Streaming Wars & Platform Swerves

From its inception the series was as much about business strategy as it was about Titans. Titans debuted on the streaming service DC Universe in October 2018, as that platform’s flagship live-action show. TheWrap+1 That service promised “Netflix for DC” but soon ran into trouble.

By 2020 the decision was made to migrate Titans (and other DCU originals) over to HBO Max. TheWrap+1 For fans, that meant juggles in subscription, region-lock frustrations, and plenty of Reddit griping:

“While Titans does have drama in it… it’s primarily a superhero show.” Reddit“I’m pretty darn happy… but we’re still no closer to having access.” Reddit

The bigger meta-story: this shift reflected a larger realignment inside Warner/DC — streaming strategy, cost-cutting, re-thinking where superhero content lives.And eventually, the show was announced to wrap with its 4th season in 2023. EW.com+1

Connections (and Complications) with the DCEU

So… how does Titans tie into the DC Extended Universe (DCEU) theatrical movies? The short answer: loosely, if at all.

• The show exists in its own TV-verse; it doesn’t duck into the theatrical timeline overtly.

• That said, for DC fans there were tasty crossover easter eggs: in Season 4, an episode (“Dude, Where’s My Gar?”) features characters from shows like Doom Patrol and Stargirl in a multiversal vision sequence. EW.com

• But the big theatrical universe — films like Justice League, Aquaman, Wonder Woman — don’t clearly integrate with Titans. The show’s tone, its streaming home, and its narrative trajectory set it apart. Many fans note the disconnect. Reddit+1

Behind the Scenes & Creative Sprints

• A 2018 behind-the-scenes feature showed how the creators wanted “punches to hurt” and a “rawer” feel than typical network-superhero fare. ScienceFiction.com

• Production was based largely in Toronto (Pinewood Toronto Studios) and Hamilton, Ontario — offering gritty urban backdrops. Repeat Replay

• The show also had its share of fan-rumoured tweaks: one Reddit thread claimed the original Season 1 finale got scrapped or re­worked because of creative decisions, leaving the season ending feeling odd. Reddit

Drama, Disappointment & Final Episodes

While not dramatic in the sense of blockbuster trailers, Titans did navigate turbulent terrain. The shift from DC Universe to HBO Max, global release delays, and concern about the show’s place in the bigger DC ecosystem all added friction.Additionally, the decision to end the series with Season 4 — while handled with thanks and a proper finish — left fans reflecting on what might have been. EW.com

Why It Still Matters

Even though Titans may live apart from the DCEU major-movie stream, it matters for several reasons:

• It showed that DC could do bold, adult-oriented TV superhero work that leaned into darkness and character.

• It was an early example of DC’s direct-to-consumer strategy, streaming chaos and all.

• For fans of the Teen Titans mythos, it offered live-action versions of beloved characters in serious arcs, not just side-kick cameos.

Shazam! (2019) charmed with sincerity and humor, proving audiences didn’t need every hero to brood.

Shazam! deliberately pivoted toward wish-fulfillment fantasy and family comedy. David F. Sandberg’s direction framed the superhero myth as a metaphor for found family and self-acceptance. Warner Bros. pursued Shazam! as a deliberate counter-programming move: a mid-budget superhero film emphasizing character over spectacle. After Justice League’s turbulence (2017), executives sought to diversify DC output with director-driven stand-alones. Sandberg was given wide creative latitude, limited studio interference, and a smaller budget that reduced financial risk.

Then, a total curveball: Todd Phillips’ Joker (2019).

Made for just $55 million, Joker turned into a billion-dollar phenomenon. Joaquin Phoenix’s descent into madness earned him an Oscar and turned the film into both controversy and cultural moment. Its success proved that small-scale, auteur-driven stories could thrive under the DC banner.

Joker delves into mental illness, alienation, and systemic failure. Unlike traditional comic book films, it strips away the superhero context to create a grounded, grim exploration of what could drive an ordinary man to become a monster. It was barely a fantasy and more a gritty, pessimistic look at the world. There were no costumed vigilantes or people flying through the air. It was about moral, societal decay.

Joker proved that DC properties could succeed outside of shared-universe storytelling, focusing instead on auteur-driven, mature narratives.

After its success, Warner Bros. began emphasizing “DC Elseworlds” projects — stories that exist apart from continuity.

Matt Reeves’ The Batman (2022) followed the same path

A noir detective epic with Robert Pattinson as a bruised, emo loner. Shot through rain and paranoia, it earned acclaim and profit. Both Joker and The Batman lived outside the DCEU, and in doing so, exposed a strange truth: DC worked best when it wasn’t trying to be Marvel.

The film itself begins with a string of brutal murders committed by a masked serial killer, the Riddler (Paul Dano), whose victims are Gotham’s elite political figures.

Matt Reeves reimagines Batman as a gritty detective noir, more akin to Se7en or Zodiac than a traditional superhero film. Gotham is rain-soaked, perpetually shadowed, and pulsing with corruption — a character in itself. The film’s cinematography (by Greig Fraser) uses deep reds, chiaroscuro lighting, and grounded camera work to create a lived-in realism that separates it from the stylized spectacle of earlier DC entries.

But what was going on in the main Universe?

VI. Navigating A Global Pandemic

Back in the main Universe, we had more experimental and fun loving films.

Released in February 2020, Birds of Prey was Warner Bros.’ attempt to spin off Harley Quinn, one of the most popular breakout characters from Suicide Squad (2016). Despite critical praise for its anarchic energy and Margot Robbie’s performance, the film stumbled at the box office — not because of the pandemic (which would hit a month later), but due to marketing confusion, tonal risks, and audience disconnect.

In hindsight, Birds of Prey reflects a fascinating transitional moment for the DC Extended Universe (DCEU) — one caught between the dark, serialized vision of Zack Snyder and the new, director-driven era under Walter Hamada.

Stylistically, Birds of Prey was bold, chaotic, and unapologetically weird:

• The film used nonlinear storytelling, narrated by Harley in a frenetic, unreliable way reminiscent of Deadpool.

• Visually, it embraced neon punk aesthetics, practical fight choreography, and comic-book-inspired set pieces.

• Thematically, it was about female empowerment and self-liberation, told through Harley’s rejection of her abusive relationship with the Joker.

This approach made Birds of Prey stand out tonally from previous DCEU entries — brighter than Snyder’s films, but edgier and more stylistically adventurous than Shazam! (2019).

Opening weekend:

• Domestic: $33 million (below expectations of $45–55 million)

• Worldwide total: $205 million, which fell short of profitability after marketing costs

At the time, media outlets labeled the film a box office disappointment. However, it’s important to contextualize this:

• The film released just weeks before COVID-19 shuttered global theaters.

• The R rating limited the younger demographic that had embraced Suicide Squad.

• Marketing confusion hurt awareness — the film was later retitled to “Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey” mid-release to improve visibility.

So while it technically underperformed, Birds of Prey’s failure wasn’t total — it performed decently on digital platforms and found a cult audience later, especially for its action design and feminist themes.

Birds of Prey fit that model perfectly — but its weak box office made Warner Bros. nervous about high-risk, R-rated ventures. The studio quietly scaled back plans for follow-ups, including:

• A Birds of Prey 2 (never developed beyond early talks)

• A Gotham City Sirens spinoff that was shelved

• Potential expansions focusing on Huntress or Black Canary (though a Black Canary solo film is still in early development for streaming)

Instead, Warner Bros. pivoted toward projects with broader appeal and clearer brand recognition.

But Harley Quinn's Birds of Prey wasn't the only movie to come out during the pandemic.

After the enormous success of Wonder Woman (2017), which grossed $822 million worldwide and became the DCEU’s first universally acclaimed hit, Warner Bros. fast-tracked a sequel.

Director Patty Jenkins and star Gal Gadot returned, with Jenkins promising a different kind of story — not darker or grittier, but “a grand, romantic, and hopeful 1980s adventure” inspired by the era’s optimism and excess.

The film was co-written by Jenkins, Geoff Johns, and Dave Callaham, and set decades after the original, during the Cold War. The goal: show Diana Prince in a world without her Amazon sisters or Steve Trevor, navigating humanity’s greed and moral decay.

Tone and Aesthetic

Stylistically, WW84 leaned heavily into 1980s nostalgia — bright colors, mall culture, synth music, and Cold War anxiety.Unlike the battle-hardened tone of Batman v Superman or Man of Steel, this film embraced earnest heroism and comic-book optimism.

Jenkins envisioned WW84 as “a Richard Donner-style superhero movie” — with sincerity, moral clarity, and a sense of wonder. Yet, while this worked for some, others found the tone inconsistent and overly sentimental.

Production and Pandemic Challenges

Originally slated for December 2019, WW84 was delayed multiple times — first for post-production, then due to the COVID-19 pandemic.By late 2020, Warner Bros. faced an unprecedented decision: release the film simultaneously in theaters and on HBO Max (on December 25, 2020).

This hybrid release made WW84 the first major blockbuster to debut on streaming during the pandemic — a landmark move that reshaped Hollywood’s release strategies.However, it also devastated box office returns, as most theaters were still closed or operating under restrictions.

Box Office Performance

Despite enormous hype, Wonder Woman 1984 grossed:

• $169 million worldwide on a $200 million budget.

• Domestically, it earned just $46 million — a far cry from the first film’s $412 million domestic total.

Warner Bros. touted its HBO Max success — calling it the platform’s most-watched title at the time — but financially, it was one of the studio’s biggest theatrical disappointments.

Nevertheless, the film’s streaming boost helped Warner Bros. justify its risky “day-and-date” release experiment for its entire 2021 slate (The Suicide Squad, Dune, Matrix Resurrections, etc.).

Critical and Fan Reception

The reaction was deeply divided:

Positive praise:

• Gal Gadot’s performance remained charismatic and heartfelt.

• The film’s moral optimism and emotional sincerity resonated with some viewers amid a bleak year.

• Pedro Pascal’s over-the-top villain was widely enjoyed as campy fun.

Criticism:

• The plot was seen as overly convoluted and illogical, with major pacing issues.

• The “wish” mechanic introduced confusing stakes and unclear rules.

• The resurrection of Steve Trevor through another man’s body raised ethical concerns.

• Many found the final act anti-climactic and morally simplistic.

Rotten Tomatoes score: 58%, a stark drop from the first film’s 93%.Even fans who loved the 2017 Wonder Woman struggled with the sequel’s disjointed tone and pacing.

Warner Bros.’ Reaction and Franchise Impact

At first, Warner Bros. was optimistic. Within days of release, the studio announced Patty Jenkins and Gal Gadot would return for Wonder Woman 3 — signaling faith in the character despite WW84’s reception.

However, internal tensions soon grew:

• Jenkins clashed with the studio over creative direction for the third film.

• The mixed critical response and weak box office led Warner Bros. to reassess big-budget, character-driven sequels.

• By the time James Gunn and Peter Safran took over DC Studios in 2022, Wonder Woman 3 was officially canceled — marking the end of Jenkins’ arc and leaving Diana’s cinematic future uncertain.

In retrospect, WW84 became a turning point — the last major DCEU film before the franchise’s gradual unraveling under Warner Bros. Discovery’s restructuring.

VII. Loading The Gunn

When The Suicide Squad hit theaters and HBO Max in August 2021, it wasn’t just another superhero film — it was the product of Hollywood chaos, corporate reinvention, and one director’s remarkable comeback story. To understand its significance, you have to look at the chain reaction that started with Gunn’s unexpected fall from grace at Marvel and ended with him reshaping the future of DC.

The Fall: Gunn’s Marvel Firing and Industry Backlash

In July 2018, James Gunn — then best known as the irreverent creative mind behind Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy — was abruptly fired by Disney after controversial decade-old tweets resurfaced online.

The firing shocked fans and industry peers alike. Gunn had turned obscure comic book characters into one of Marvel’s most beloved franchises, blending humor, heart, and found-family themes. The tweets, which Gunn had previously apologized for years earlier, resurfaced through coordinated online outrage, prompting Disney to act swiftly amid public scrutiny.

What followed was intense backlash from fans, critics, and even the Guardians cast, who publicly supported Gunn. Dave Bautista, in particular, was vocal about Disney’s decision, threatening to quit if Gunn’s script for Guardians Vol. 3 wasn’t used.

For months, Gunn’s future in Hollywood seemed uncertain. Then, in a surprising twist, Warner Bros. — Marvel’s chief rival — made their move.

The Rebound: Gunn Crosses Over to DC

In October 2018, Warner Bros. hired Gunn to write (and later direct) a new Suicide Squad film for DC. The studio was in a precarious position: the DCEU was reeling from the divisive reactions to Batman v Superman and Justice League, while Wonder Woman (2017) and Aquaman (2018) had shown that standalone, director-driven films could still succeed.

Gunn’s reputation for ensemble storytelling, offbeat humor, and emotionally grounded misfits made him a perfect fit for a Suicide Squad reboot. Warner Bros. gave him full creative freedom — something rare in the studio’s post-Snyder era.

Rather than making a direct sequel to David Ayer’s Suicide Squad (2016), Gunn envisioned what he called a “soft reboot”: a violent, absurd, war-movie-inspired romp that embraced chaos and black comedy. Some characters returned (Harley Quinn, Amanda Waller, Rick Flag, Captain Boomerang), while new ones joined — Bloodsport, Peacemaker, King Shark, Ratcatcher 2, and Polka-Dot Man.

The State of the DCEU at the Time

By the time Gunn started production, the DCEU was in transition. Zack Snyder’s influence had faded following the Justice League debacle, and Warner Bros. was moving toward standalone, director-led projects under Walter Hamada.

The studio wanted films that didn’t rely on a tightly interconnected universe. Gunn’s project fit perfectly: bold, irreverent, and self-contained. Meanwhile, Wonder Woman 1984 was awaiting release, The Flash was in developmental limbo, and the future of characters like Superman and Batman was uncertain.

The Suicide Squad became a symbol of the DCEU’s identity crisis — a movie that embraced freedom over formula, style over continuity.

The Film: Gunn Unleashed

Released in August 2021, The Suicide Squad delivered exactly what Gunn promised — an R-rated, hyper-violent, emotionally bizarre superhero war movie that felt like Saving Private Ryan meets Looney Tunes.

Key hallmarks of Gunn’s approach:

• Moral chaos: Villains forced into heroism under Amanda Waller’s control.

• Shock value: The opening sequence brutally kills off half the squad, subverting expectations.

• Heart beneath absurdity: Ratcatcher 2 and her relationship with Bloodsport gave the film unexpected emotional weight.

• Pure cinematic freedom: Gunn blended grindhouse violence with moments of surreal beauty — such as Harley Quinn’s flower-filled rampage.

Critics praised its balance of insanity and sincerity, with many calling it the best DCEU film since Wonder Woman. Rotten Tomatoes scored it at 90%, a massive improvement over Ayer’s 2016 version.

Box Office and Pandemic Context

Despite glowing reviews, The Suicide Squad underperformed financially, earning around $168 million worldwide on a $185 million budget. However, this came during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and its simultaneous HBO Max release, which severely undercut theatrical numbers.

Warner Bros. still considered the film a creative triumph, and Gunn’s success quickly led to a spinoff: the HBO Max series “Peacemaker” (2022), starring John Cena — which became one of the platform’s most-watched original shows and received strong reviews.

Fan and Studio Response

Fans largely embraced Gunn’s film for its unapologetic weirdness and heart. It marked a turning point for DC: a film that wasn’t trying to compete with Marvel but instead leaned into its own anarchic identity.

The studio, impressed with Gunn’s results and leadership, quickly deepened their relationship with him. In 2022, after Walter Hamada’s exit, Warner Bros. Discovery appointed James Gunn and Peter Safran as co-heads of the newly restructured DC Studios, effectively putting Gunn in charge of the DC Universe’s future.

In an ironic twist, the man Disney fired became one of the most powerful creative figures in superhero cinema — not just directing films, but rebuilding an entire cinematic universe.

Legacy and Impact

The Suicide Squad is now seen as a turning point in DC’s evolution — a bridge between the chaotic, uneven DCEU of the past and the more curated, creator-driven DC of the future. It demonstrated that superhero films could be:

• Brutally violent yet emotionally genuine

• Funny without being cynical

• Artistically bold even within a corporate franchise

Gunn’s redemption arc — from public firing to creative resurgence — mirrored the very themes he loves to explore: broken people finding purpose through chaos.

VIII. The Hierarchy Of Power Is About To Change

If one story epitomized the DCEU’s late-stage chaos, it was Black Adam. Dwayne Johnson spent over a decade willing it into existence, promising a “new hierarchy of power in the DC Universe.”

Behind the scenes, he lobbied for creative control, a Superman crossover, and even a mini-franchise centered on his antihero. He succeeded in convincing Warner to resurrect Henry Cavill’s Superman for a cameo — briefly teasing a shared future.

There are multiple overlapping reports and interpretations, so here are the clearest, sourced points:

• Johnson’s ambitions: Dwayne Johnson and his production company (Seven Bucks Productions) had long pushed for Black Adam to be more than a single movie — Johnson actively lobbied for Black Adam to be a major center of new DC plans and publicly talked about building out a Johnson-led DC strand. He and his team spent years trying to influence casting and the direction of connected projects. hollywoodreporter.com+1

• Reports of a “takeover” pitch: multiple trade and reporting outlets (and later aggregator reports) described discussions in which Johnson sought a bigger operational role or influence in the DC film slate — some pieces framed this as an attempt by Seven Bucks to take creative or managerial control of elements of DC’s film output. These reports are partly based on anonymous studio sources and have been summarized by outlets such as The Wrap and other trades. boundingintocomics.com+1

• What went wrong (studio change + box office + leaks): after Black Adam’s release there were leadership shifts at Warner Bros. Discovery (new priorities under CEO David Zaslav and then new DC leadership under James Gunn and Peter Safran). Outlets also reported internal friction: studio executives questioned some of the figures pushed publicly about marketing and ancillary income; Puck/Deadline/others reported tensions over leaked or exaggerated financial claims. Combined, leadership changes and the film’s middling long-term financial picture essentially closed the window on Johnson’s proposed way forward at DC at that time. Johnson himself has said the sequel and takeover plans were snared in a “vortex of new leadership.” Wikipedia+1

Important nuance: those “takeover” stories are often based on anonymous sources, industry gossip, and competing narratives (Johnson’s camp, Warner executives, and later reporting). Different outlets interpret the same facts in different ways — some emphasize Johnson’s ambition, others emphasize studio missteps or the simple reality that Warner’s strategy changed. Treat the “takeover” framing as a summary of reported ambition + friction rather than a single proven conspiracy. boundingintocomics.com+1

But within weeks, the Discovery merger changed everything. CEO David Zaslav wanted new leadership, and in late 2022, James Gunn and Peter Safran were appointed as co-heads of DC Studios. The old regime was gone — and so was Johnson’s vision.

Suddenly, all the plans Johnson and Cavill had teased were irrelevant.

The Black Adam vs. Superman sequel? Gone.

Cavill’s return? Cancelled.

Johnson’s DC vision? Out the window.

After the 2021 film The Suicide Squad, creator/director James Gunn and the team at Warner Bros. and HBO Max decided to launch a series centered on Christopher Smith / Peacemaker (played by John Cena). As Gunn noted at the trailer launch, all eight episodes of Season 1 were written by him, and he directed five of them. Gadgets 360+2Comics2Film+2The premise: Smith returns home after the film’s events, is forced into a classified mission (“Project Butterfly”), works with agents from A.R.G.U.S., and deals with his moral demons (yes — he believes in peace at any cost, including murder). Comics2Film+1The tone was unusual for a superhero show: hyper-violent, comedic, irreverent, self-aware. Gunn wanted to lean into the bizarre. For example: the opening credits’ dance sequence built around Wig Wam’s “Do Ya Wanna Taste It”? That came directly from his script. EW.com

So the show began with style, ambition, and a cheeky wink to fans of both the DCEU and Gunn’s previous work.

While the show hit with a distinct voice, there were some interesting production and studio-side notes:

• The VFX: A behind-the-scenes reel revealed how much of the show was CG — everything from Peacemaker’s eagle side-kick “Eagly” to the alien butterfly enemies. The show ran heavy on visuals despite being a streaming series. ComicBook.com

• Streaming platform issues: The show, exclusive to HBO Max, had rollout and availability issues internationally. Some fans complained about access delays and confusion about how to watch globally. Reddit+1

• Corporate re-branding noise: The series spanned a time of flux for the streaming service (changing names, rebranding between Max/HBO Max). Gunn even joked about the platform’s name during Season 2’s promo. GameRant

• On-set atmosphere: Gunn posted photos of cast and crew on what he described as “one of our happiest days on set.” Despite the show’s violent and wild content, the team seemed to enjoy the ride. ComicBook.com

And though not major public scandal, the usual pressures of shooting a high-profile show under a large franchise banner were present: managing tone, brand expectations, streaming metrics, international rollout. All that plays into the “studio reaction” piece.

From the studio side, Peacemaker represented an experiment: could a streaming series spin off a theatrical tent-pole (The Suicide Squad) and carry enough weight on its own? The answer seems “yes” — it was renewed for Season 2 and became a key component of the larger DC strategy.

But important hints of studio/brand thinking emerged:

• The show was pitched as part of the DCEU (DC Extended Universe) — connected to the film era. From the trailer snippet, the tie-in with The Suicide Squad was clear. Gadgets 360+1

• The studio (Warner Bros. / DC) allowed Gunn a lot of freedom, which suggests a degree of trust in his voice and direction.

• With Season 2, the show began to shift — not just continuing the story of Peacemaker, but also becoming one of the first visible pieces of the transition into the new DCU (DC Universe) era. (More on that next.)

• From a metrics/strategy vantage point: launching a show this bold in tone suggests the studio was willing to cater to adult-audience streaming content rather than just family-friendly films. That may have affected how the studio viewed streaming vs theatrical strategy.

In short, the studio’s reaction appears to have been positive: the show worked enough to continue, and served as a kind of sandbox for the evolving DC brand.

IX. Collapse, Mergers, and the End of an Era

When Warner Bros. merged with Discovery in 2022, it wasn’t just a corporate deal — it was the cinematic equivalent of a multiverse collapse. Behind the press releases and investor calls, the move sent shockwaves through Hollywood, upending the already-fragile DC Extended Universe (DCEU) and setting the stage for one of the most dramatic creative reboots in blockbuster history.

As AT&T spun off WarnerMedia and merged it with Discovery, the new corporate overlords found a studio burning cash. Budgets were trimmed, projects axed — including the nearly finished Batgirl film, shelved for tax reasons. The message was blunt: rebuild or die.

The Batgirl cancellation underscores the high stakes in the superhero-movie space: budgets are large, expectations are high, and companies are increasingly unwilling to release films they believe will damage their brand.

Enter David Zaslav, Discovery’s no-nonsense CEO, now head of the new empire. He made one thing crystal clear from day one: DC needs to be fixed. In his own words, “DC is at the top of the list.” Translation: the DCEU’s years of chaos — from Zack Snyder’s dark, divisive vision to the patchy, inconsistent spin-offs — were about to get a corporate exorcism.

For WBD and DC, it marks a change of direction: fewer “streaming-only large budget” films for DC, more focus on theatrical and on fewer, higher-profiling projects.

The official line? “Strategic realignment.” The real story? Money, optics, and a brutal new philosophy: if it doesn’t fit the new DC vision, it’s gone. Batgirl became the canary in the coal mine — a $90-million casualty of corporate course correction.

Even insiders were shocked. Cast and crew found out along with the public. Grace later shared behind-the-scenes clips on Instagram, giving fans a bittersweet glimpse of the movie they’d never see.

The move is a cautionary tale: even completed films can be shelved if they don’t align with corporate strategy, expected returns, or brand goals.

But things were only going to get worse...and much more contreversial.

X. The Final Breaths of A Dying Franchise

When Shazam! Fury of the Gods premiered in March 2023, it arrived as both a sequel and a relic — a holdover from a cinematic universe already on life support. Despite good intentions, returning talent, and plenty of charm, the film failed to capture the lightning-in-a-bottle success of the first Shazam! (2019).

It wasn’t just another superhero sequel; it was the unfortunate byproduct of a collapsing franchise, shifting studio priorities, and superhero fatigue hitting its peak.

Following the success of Shazam! (2019) — praised for its humor, heart, and smaller-scale storytelling — Warner Bros. quickly greenlit a sequel. Director David F. Sandberg, known for blending horror and family adventure, returned alongside star Zachary Levi and the rest of the Shazam Family.

However, production delays, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Warner Bros.’ corporate reshuffling under Discovery’s merger repeatedly pushed the project back. By the time Fury of the Gods finally hit theaters, the DCEU was being dismantled, and new DC Studios heads James Gunn and Peter Safran were preparing a complete reboot.

In essence, Shazam! 2 was released into a universe that no longer existed.

Released on March 17, 2023, Fury of the Gods opened to a dismal $30 million domestic weekend, and went on to earn only $133 million worldwide against a reported $110 million budget (not including marketing).

This made it one of the worst-performing DCEU films ever — even below Black Adam (2022).Its release was sandwiched between the announcements of James Gunn’s DCU reboot and the fading remnants of the old DCEU (The Flash and Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom).

With little connection to future projects and no clear continuity, audiences saw Fury of the Gods as nonessential, a side story in a universe about to be erased.

As the sequel Shazam! Fury of the Gods underperformed, Levi’s public comments started drawing more attention than his movies. He slammed Hollywood for making “garbage” films, called studio executives “uncaring,” and frustrated fans by joking that the actors’ strike rules were “so dumb.”

Then came the tweet that truly broke the internet: a post agreeing that “Pfizer is a real danger to the world.” Many saw it as anti-vaccine rhetoric, and social media quickly turned on him.

Levi didn’t back down. In interviews, he doubled down on sharing his political views — from supporting Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to endorsing Donald Trump. He admitted that some in Hollywood now “prefer not to work with me,” but said he wasn’t going to stay quiet just to stay employed.

What followed was a steady cooling of enthusiasm around him. Once the face of a promising DC franchise, Levi found himself at odds with both the industry and a portion of his audience. Even some colleagues spoke out, accusing him of using personal tragedies to push political messages.

When The Flash finally landed in theaters in June 2023 it arrived as a strange hybrid: part grief drama (Barry’s quest to save his mother), part multiversal caper (three different Batmen, multiple timelines), and part nostalgic nostalgia (Michael Keaton’s Batman returning to the big screen). Director Andy Muschietti leaned hard into emotional beats while trying to balance spectacle and comedy — a tonal juggling act that critics and audiences reacted to unevenly. The film’s run-time, visual-effects demands, and a reportedly massive assembly cut are evidence of a movie born of big ambitions and post-production tinkering: Muschietti revealed the existence of a very long assembly cut from which he pared the final film.

The Flash is a movie that is...complicated. And often gross to talk about regarding the issues surronding the main actor involved, Ezra Miller.

• Starting in 2022, a series of incidents, allegations, and arrests involving Ezra Miller began to be reported publicly. Those incidents ranged across alleged harassment, disorderly conduct, allegations of grooming (reported by multiple outlets), and legal troubles in different jurisdictions. The coverage was rapid, intense, and cumulative; each new report added to a perception problem for the lead of a major studio franchise. rollingstone.com+2variety.com+2

• One concrete legal outcome: Miller pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in Vermont related to an alleged home break-in and theft of alcohol, receiving a sentence that included probation, a fine, and mandated treatment rather than jail time. That plea and sentencing were public record and widely reported. AP News

• Alongside the legal matters were numerous civil allegations and media reports ranging from disturbing behavior to claims of grooming. These were reported by major outlets and compiled into timelines by publications such as People, Rolling Stone, Variety, and others. The reports are allegations and journalistic accounts; when criminal charges proceeded they are reflected in court filings and outcomes that I cited above. People.com+2rollingstone.com+2

Imagine the studio meeting: a $200M+ production, months of marketing spent, theatrical release imminent, and a lead actor suddenly the subject of highly damaging headlines. The business options are blunt:

• Delay the release — gives breathing room but risks marketing costs and calendar congestion.

• Recast and reshoot major portions — astronomically expensive and sometimes impossible on time.

• Release as is and manage PR — risky from a brand perspective but least disruptive to a production schedule.

Warner Bros. chose, at least through mid-2023, to move forward with the film as made. Multiple trade outlets reported that the studio was not planning (at that time) to recast Miller for the theatrical release and that leadership and creatives framed Miller’s issues as personal/medical problems they hoped treatment would address. The decision reflected the practical and financial reality of tentpole filmmaking as much as it did any moral calculus. variety.com+1

Director Andy Muschietti publicly defended his casting and repeatedly said he had no plans to recast for potential sequels — a protective stance toward his lead and toward the creative vision that centered on Miller’s performance. That defense, sincere or strategic, contributed to the perception that the creative team would stand by their star. The Playlist+1

But Ezra's involvement was not the only thing that left fans with a sour taste in their mouths.

In the film’s climactic sequence, Barry Allen races through the “Chronobowl,” witnessing alternate realities colliding. What should’ve been a triumphant celebration of DC’s history quickly took an unsettling turn. Audiences were stunned to see digital recreations of past actors — including Christopher Reeve’s Superman, George Reeves, and even Adam West’s Batman — brought back to life using CGI and AI techniques. Some of these stars had been gone for decades, and none had consented to these appearances, sparking widespread backlash online.

What was meant as a tribute landed more like a ghostly spectacle. Viewers called the deepfake cameos “creepy” and “exploitative,” arguing that resurrecting deceased actors for cameos cheapened their legacy. Even fans who appreciated the nods to DC’s cinematic past felt the execution lacked respect and emotional depth — as if the studio relied on digital nostalgia rather than meaningful storytelling.

Adding to the criticism, the entire multiverse sequence was drenched in stylized, rubbery CGI that director Andy Muschietti later claimed was intentional, meant to represent Barry’s distorted perception of time. But for many, it just looked unfinished — especially when paired with the uncanny digital faces of beloved icons.

What could have been a heartfelt homage instead became a cautionary tale about technology in filmmaking. The Flash didn’t just test the limits of the multiverse — it tested how audiences feel about AI’s role in resurrecting the past. In the end, the film may be remembered less for its speedster hero, and more for the moment when Hollywood’s digital reach officially went too far.

But the DCEU was trying to move forward.

Blue Beetle (2023) fared little better commercially, despite glowing reviews and cultural authenticity.

Blue Beetle (2023) was widely regarded as one of DC’s stronger late-era releases — heartfelt, funny, and refreshingly grounded. Director Ángel Manuel Soto crafted a Latino-centered superhero story with family warmth and cultural authenticity that critics praised for its sincerity, performances (especially Xolo Maridueña’s), and its vibrant aesthetic.

Yet, despite those positives, the film underperformed financially. Released in August 2023 amid DC brand fatigue, the ongoing Hollywood strikes (which prevented its cast from promoting it), and confusion about the franchise’s reboot under James Gunn, Blue Beetle struggled to find an audience. Its marketing was modest, and general audiences seemed disengaged from the fading DCEU continuity.

The result: a well-reviewed, heartfelt superhero film that many felt deserved better — a casualty of timing, franchise uncertainty, and market exhaustion rather than of quality.

When Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom premiered in December 2023, it wasn’t just another superhero sequel — it was the final gasp of the DC Extended Universe, a franchise defined by ambition, missteps, and corporate chaos.

Despite following the billion-dollar success of the first Aquaman (2018), The Lost Kingdom faced a perfect storm: years of reshoots, leadership changes, social media controversies, and a studio already looking ahead to its rebooted DCU.

By the time it reached audiences, the once-promising underwater epic had become a symbol of everything that went wrong with the DCEU’s final years — and how even its biggest hit couldn’t escape the tide of change.

After Aquaman became a $1.15 billion global phenomenon, Warner Bros. was eager to get director James Wan and star Jason Momoa back for a sequel. Wan, however, wanted to take his time, promising a darker, more mature story that would expand the world of Atlantis while addressing environmental themes.

Initially slated for 2022, the film’s production was plagued by:

• Multiple COVID-19 delays

• Extensive reshoots throughout 2022 and 2023

• Changing DC leadership, including the arrival of James Gunn and Peter Safran, who were rebooting the DC Universe mid-production

• Ongoing controversy surrounding Amber Heard’s casting following her legal battle with Johnny Depp

Wan later admitted that the film was “reworked several times” as Warner Bros. executives debated how much it should connect to the now-defunct DCEU — with cameos from Batman (Ben Affleck) and Superman (Henry Cavill) filmed, then cut, then briefly considered again before the film’s release.

By the time The Lost Kingdom finally hit theaters, it was clear: it would close the DCEU, but it wouldn’t define it.

The Lost Kingdom became infamous for its behind-the-scenes chaos, much of which spilled into public view:

• Amber Heard Controversy:Heard’s reduced screen time (reportedly cut to less than 10 minutes) sparked heated online debates, petitions, and polarized fan reactions.

• Reshoots and Test Screenings:Reports surfaced of poor test screenings, prompting several rounds of reshoots — at least three major revisions over two years.

• Shifting DC Leadership:The film went through at least three different studio regimes — from Walter Hamada to Michael De Luca/Pam Abdy, and finally to James Gunn & Peter Safran. Each had different ideas about how (or if) the film should tie into the larger DC continuity.

Wan later expressed frustration with the process, saying in interviews that The Lost Kingdom had to “fit into too many versions of a universe that kept changing.”

Released on December 22, 2023, Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom opened to a tepid $28 million domestic weekend, well below expectations.

Worldwide, it grossed approximately $434 million — a steep drop from the first film’s billion-dollar haul. Given its estimated $205 million budget (plus heavy marketing costs), the film was financially underwhelming, barely breaking even.

Henry Cavill, caught in the transition, was briefly announced as returning to Superman — only to be recast weeks later when Gunn confirmed a reboot. “Henry was treated unfairly,” Gunn admitted later, “but we needed to start fresh.”

The gods had finally fallen.

XI. Rebirth — James Gunn’s Vision

In October 2022, Gunn and producer Peter Safran were appointed co-CEOs of DC Studios. This move was framed as the start of “Phase One” of a new cinematic strategy. 9meters+2CBR+2

From the start, Gunn emphasized that his role would not be purely executive window-dressing:

“My job here is truly as a creative force.” GamesRadar+He and Safran immediately began sketching a 10-year-plus roadmap for what would become the DC Universe (DCU), a unified but flexible narrative ecosystem spanning film, television and animation. GamesRadar++1

What Gunn Wanted (and Didn’t)

A decade-long narrative arc

Gunn repeatedly described the DCU plan not as a quick reset but a prolonged story arc:

“It’s very loose … but you have to be willing and able to shift anytime you need to.” GamesRadar++1He emphasised variety in tone—no “one company style” for all DCU entries. GamesRadar+

Soft reboot, not a total erasure

One of the early major questions was: what happens to the DCEU continuity? Gunn answered: some characters, some plot-points may carry over—but largely, the DCU is a fresh start. CBR+1For example:

• Some actors from the DCEU (e.g., Xolo Maridueña as Blue Beetle, John Cena as Peacemaker, Viola Davis as Amanda Waller) would transition—but often as variants or in a redefined continuity. CBR

• Major previous films would not all count as part of the new “core” universe. Some would exist as memories, analogues, or non-canon. reddit.com+1

• Some actors such as Jason Mamoa have been rumored to appear in the new DCU, but as different characters

Structure & Slate: Chapter One “Gods & Monsters”

The first chapter of the DCU was named Gods & Monsters, indicating a thematic layering of mythic heroes and darker, monstrous threats. GamesRadar++1The slate included both films and TV/animation:

• Live-action film to launch: Superman (2025) – described as a “foundation” of the new DCU. ComicBook.com

• On the small-screen side: Peacemaker Season 2, Creature Commandos (animated) and others were woven in. JustWatch+1

The transition from DCEU to DCU under James Gunn is less about “wipe everything and start over” and more about “edit the story, keep the best pieces, and build stronger from here.” It’s a brave positioning: admit prior missteps, embrace a new era, and ask fans (and new audiences) to trust a longer game.

Whether the DCU will ultimately succeed in becoming the stable, coherent, creatively bold universe Gunn envisions remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: under this new regime, DC is no longer playing catch-up. It’s rewriting the narrative.

XII — The Small Screen Successes (A Look At The CW "Arrowverse" and Other Television Shows)

DC on television has never been a single thing. It’s been a sprawling, sometimes glorious, sometimes fractured experiment in tone, platform strategy, and fan expectation.

One sentence summary

DC’s TV landscape built unforgettable characters and proved that serialized TV could outpace the DCEU in emotional depth and continuity — but corporate reshuffles, platform moves, creative inconsistencies, and multiverse hair-splitting left most shows effectively separate islands rather than parts of a single cinematic ecosystem.

The major players (who’s who on the small screen)

The Arrowverse (The CW)

Launched by Arrow (2012), the Arrowverse grew into the TV equivalent of a shared franchise: Arrow, The Flash, Supergirl (later folded into the crossover pool), Legends of Tomorrow, Batwoman, Black Lightning, Stargirl (arguably peripheral), and a string of annual multi-show crossovers culminating in events like Crisis on Infinite Earths. Those crossovers created a genuine “shared TV world” feeling and even staged a headline-making moment when Ezra Miller — playing the DCEU Flash — briefly appeared, confirming that the Arrowverse and movie universe were, at minimum, multiversal neighbors. Wikipedia

Why it matters: The Arrowverse proved serialized TV could sustain long character arcs and reward longtime viewers — something the DCEU frequently failed to do.

The Titans / HBO Max strand

Starting with Titans (and companion shows like Doom Patrol), this corner of DC TV aimed for grittier adult drama with a comic-accurate willingness to go dark and weird. Doom Patrol in particular became a critical darling for its surrealism and heart (and its fraught canonical journey illustrates how messy DC onscreen continuity could be). By the early 2020s HBO Max became the primary U.S. home for these shows. Den of Geek+1

Why it matters: These shows demonstrated tonal freedom — but their adult, niche sensibility made them poor candidates for mass-market DCEU tie-ins.

Gothamverse & Pennyworth

Gotham (Fox) was a prequel take on the Batman world, charting how Bruce Wayne’s city decayed into the gothic playground of future villains. Pennyworth (originally on Epix, later on HBO Max) tells an alternate-history origin of Alfred. Both showed DC’s appetite for alternate timelines and tonal re-imagining; Pennyworth even leaned into being its own retro-stylized piece of the Batman mythos. Pennyworth eventually concluded amid the broader DC TV shakeup. EW.com+1

Why it matters: Gothamverse projects showed you can recast canonical characters in wildly different tonal clothes — but that also made them hard to plug into any single cinematic canon.

Superman & Lois, Stargirl, Black Lightning, Batwoman, etc.

• Superman & Lois explored the family, small-town side of the Man of Steel. Its success with viewers did not fully immunize it from corporate strategy decisions later on. fandom.com+1

• Stargirl began as a lighter teenage-hero show and sat on the fringes of Arrowverse continuity. Reddit

• Black Lightning ran mostly separate and often handled timely social issues.These shows show DC’s breadth: family drama (Superman & Lois), hopeful teen fare (Stargirl), and socially conscious genre TV (Black Lightning).

Why it matters: Diversity of tone is an advantage — and a problem — when you try to present a single brand to audiences who want both prestige drama and popcorn spectacle.

Premium HBO experiments: Watchmen, Peacemaker, Harley Quinn (animation)

HBO’s Watchmen (an audacious prestige miniseries) and HBO Max series like Peacemaker (a TV offshoot from The Suicide Squad) showed that DC IP could be used for auteur projects and mature, tonal experiments — again, often separate from DCEU continuity.

Why it matters: High-quality, boundary-pushing TV can burnish DC’s reputation, but those shows aren’t always scalable into a “cineverse.”

How these shows actually connect with the DCEU (the film side)

Short version: mostly not — but with a handful of canonical winks.

• The Arrowverse’s Crisis on Infinite Earths cameo from Ezra Miller’s DCEU Flash is the clearest on-screen connective tissue: it explicitly put the films and Arrowverse on separate Earths within a multiverse. That cameo proved the multiverse concept was a workable bridge, but it didn’t mean the shows would be narratively tied to the blockbuster slate. Wikipedia

• Most other TV shows — Titans, Doom Patrol, Gotham, Pennyworth, Superman & Lois — were produced as self-contained TV universes. They prioritized internal continuity, not film tie-ins. Titans and Doom Patrol flirted with canonical placement but ultimately ran their own arcs. Den of Geek+1

Net effect: the DC multiverse on screen is real, but it’s modular. TV showed you can tell great long stories with DC characters without the films; the films showed you can do big spectacle without much TV help. Attempts to force one model into the other usually fell apart.

Studio meddling, platform theater, and the merger hammer

Platform migration & catalog chaos

• DC’s TV output lived across different platforms (The CW, Fox, HBO, Epix, DC Universe streaming, HBO Max). The migration of DC Universe originals to HBO Max (and the later consolidation / purges under Warner Bros. Discovery) created fan confusion and fractured audiences. IMDb+1

Cost-cutting and cancellations

• The Warner Bros.–Discovery corporate reshuffle led to harsh cost-cutting decisions across film and streaming. High-profile casualties (both TV and film) embodied the risk: expensive near-completed projects shelved (the Batgirl film is the most famous example) and some series were ended or not renewed as WBD tightened strategy. Those moves damaged creative trust. People.com+1

Exec reshuffles and a new creative center

• In late 2022 WBD installed James Gunn and Peter Safran to lead DC Studios and set a long-term plan for film and TV. That was a signal that DC’s film/TV strategy would be reorganized under one creative vision — but it also meant legacy TV projects were evaluated against a new roadmap, and many didn’t fit. Warner Bros. Discovery+1

Examples of creative friction

• Pennyworth was canceled amid the 2023 DC TV shakeup even though it had a devoted audience and a unique tone; it was a casualty of the platform and strategy change. EW.com+1

• Doom Patrol and Titans were wound down as part of HBO Max’s reshaping of DC content. Fans and critics saw this as a purge: shows that had carved distinct identities were pushed aside for consolidation. IMDb+1

Controversies & fan blowback (highlights)

• Platform hopping and confusing access: viewers had to chase shows across services (DC Universe → HBO Max → network syndication), creating churn and lost viewers. IMDb

• The shelving of completed content: the Batgirl cancellation became a touchstone controversy — millions spent, near-complete film, then shelved in the name of corporate strategy and write-offs; directors, cast and crew publicly expressed frustration. People.com

• Continuity purists vs. creative reinvention: Snyder-era fans, Arrowverse loyalists, and viewers of niche HBO Max fare often clashed over what “counts” as canon. The multiverse allowed everyone to be right — and angry. Wikipedia

What worked — lessons from the shows

1. Long-form character arcs pay offTV’s serialized format lets underused characters (e.g., Diggle/John Constantine cameos, or the slow burn of Garfield’s emotional beats) evolve in ways films often can’t. Arrowverse and Superman & Lois proved richer character work builds fan loyalty.

2. Tonal clarity mattersShows that embraced a cohesive tone (Watchmen, Doom Patrol) earned critical respect. By contrast, projects that couldn’t decide who they were (neither dark drama nor pulpy fun) floundered.

3. Give creators time and runwayBuilding audience trust requires consistency. Series canceled mid-run or moved between platforms lost momentum; the Batgirl cancellation and HBO Max purges damaged trust with talent and viewers. The Hollywood Reporter+1

4. A multiverse is a tool, not a crutchCameos (like Ezra Miller) are fun, but over-reliance on inter-property teases doesn’t substitute for self-contained, satisfying narratives. TV’s best work succeeded when it felt complete on its own. Wikipedia

5. Platform strategy must align with content strategyIf a brand wants prestige TV, family shows, young-adult series, and blockbuster movies, it needs a deliberate plan for where each sits — not ad hoc consolidations that make audiences chase and executives second-guess.

What failed — cautionary tales

• Corporate short-termism: Shelving finished films or canceling beloved series for quarterly numbers erodes creative relationships and fan goodwill. (Batgirl and the HBO Max removals are poster children here.) People.com+1

• Mixed continuity without a compass: When dozens of shows inhabit overlapping—but uncommitted—continuities, audiences get exhausted. The Arrowverse handled this with a multiverse story, but other brand fragments (Gotham, Pennyworth, Titans) were left to stand alone with no clear path to integration. Wikipedia+1

• Inconsistent leadership = inconsistent slate: The Gunn/Safran reset shows that leadership vision matters — and that new leadership can mean a hard reset that leaves many prior shows orphaned. Warner Bros. Discovery

Final verdict: how the shows reshape the idea of a DCEU

• The DCEU (film continuity) and DC TV aren’t a single thing. They’re a multiverse of creative experiments: some cinematic, some televisual, many excellent in their own lane. The Arrowverse proved TV could sustain a shared universe; HBO / HBO Max experiments proved DC could be audacious and auteur-driven on the small screen. But studio consolidation, mergers, and cost-cutting repeatedly fractured the promise of continuity or unified brand strategy.

• Real integration between film and TV requires strategic will from the top (creative leadership + platform stability) and a long runway. Where studios fumbled — switching platforms, shelving finished work, and changing course under new executives — viewers and creators paid the price.

XIII — The Ghosts of the Multiverse: The Canceled Dreams of the DCEU

Here we will do a quick run down of various projects that were cancelled, adding to the chaotic nature of the mess that was the DCEU and their failure to plan long term.

Before the Beginning — Justice League: Mortal (2007–2008)

Before Zack Snyder, before Ben Affleck’s brooding vigilante, there was Justice League: Mortal.In 2007, Mad Max visionary George Miller assembled what could have been the first live-action Justice League film — years before the MCU’s Avengers.

Cast and costumes were locked: Armie Hammer as Batman, DJ Cotrona as Superman, Megan Gale as Wonder Woman, Adam Brody as Flash, and Common as Green Lantern. The film was set to shoot in Australia, boasting a gritty, mythic tone and a script rooted in Tower of Babel and Crisis storylines.

Then came disaster.

A writers’ strike, rising costs, and fears that audiences might be confused by “two Batmen” (as Nolan’s trilogy was ongoing) led Warner Bros. to pull the plug just weeks before filming.

In hindsight, Mortal feels like the original sin — DC’s first taste of the multiverse that could have been. A team-up years before Marvel’s rise, lost to hesitation.

“People weren’t ready to believe superheroes could exist together,” Miller later said. “Then Marvel did it, and everyone went, ‘Oh.’”

The Batman That Never Fought — Ben Affleck’s The Batman (2016–2018)

When Batman v Superman hit theaters, Ben Affleck’s weary, scarred Bruce Wayne was hailed as one of its strongest elements. Warner Bros. immediately announced The Batman, to be written, directed, and starred in by Affleck himself — a noir-inspired psychological thriller centered on Arkham Asylum and Deathstroke (Joe Manganiello).

By 2017, the script was reportedly finished — a lean, The Raid-style detective film exploring Batman’s guilt, violence, and aging body. Concept art showed a world both mythic and brutal. But as Snyder’s Justice League imploded and Affleck battled personal struggles and exhaustion from the franchise machine, the dream collapsed.

“Playing Batman was great,” Affleck later said, “but I had a really miserable time. I didn’t want to keep doing something that made me unhappy.”

When Matt Reeves came aboard, he rewrote The Batman from scratch, casting Robert Pattinson and crafting a standalone universe. Affleck quietly stepped away, his version fading into legend — a story about trauma, isolation, and redemption that we’ll never see.

In the ashes of his script, though, Reeves found something new: freedom from continuity.

The Goddess That Wasn’t — New Gods (2018–2021)

After Wonder Woman’s success, Warner Bros. wanted another auteur-led mythic epic. Enter Ava DuVernay (Selma, When They See Us) and comic legend Tom King, who were tasked with adapting Jack Kirby’s New Gods — an intergalactic opera featuring Darkseid, Orion, and the cosmic war between Apokolips and New Genesis.

It was meant to be the DCEU’s Lord of the Rings, a sprawling, beautiful, terrifying odyssey. DuVernay dove deep into lore, developing concept art, character arcs, and an inclusive cast of godlike beings.

Then, in 2021, Warner Bros. canceled it.

Officially, they cited “overlap with existing storylines” — translation: Snyder’s Justice League had already introduced Darkseid, and executives feared “confusion.” In reality, it was another case of shifting leadership and fear of financial risk.

DuVernay’s statement was graceful but telling: “I’m proud of the time I spent in the world of the New Gods. Darkseid stays in my heart.”

The gods, it seemed, could not survive the mortal accountants.

The Girl Who Never Took Flight — Batgirl (2021–2022)

If one cancellation epitomized Warner Bros. Discovery’s chaos, it was Batgirl.

Filmed entirely in Glasgow and starring Leslie Grace as Barbara Gordon, with Brendan Fraser as Firefly and Michael Keaton reprising his Batman, Batgirl was nearly finished — post-production, scoring, everything. Directed by Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah (Ms. Marvel, Bad Boys for Life), it was meant as an HBO Max exclusive, a mid-budget adventure about legacy and mentorship.

Then came the Discovery merger. New CEO David Zaslav wanted “event films,” not streaming content. In August 2022, Warner Bros. announced Batgirl would be shelved for tax purposes, never to be released. It was unprecedented — a completed $90 million film locked away for a write-off.

The backlash was nuclear. Grace expressed heartbreak; Kevin Feige, James Gunn, and Edgar Wright publicly supported the filmmakers. The directors revealed that they discovered the cancellation while at a wedding — logging into HBO Max only to find their film gone.

“It felt like death,” El Arbi said. “A funeral for a movie.”

Batgirl’s ghost became a symbol of the DCEU’s instability — proof that no hero, no matter how finished, was safe.

The Multiverse That Collapsed — Crisis on Infinite Earths and Beyond (2019–2022)

The DCEU flirted constantly with a grand Crisis-level crossover. The Flash (2023) was originally meant to launch that — bringing together Michael Keaton’s Batman, Cavill’s Superman, Gadot’s Wonder Woman, and even Christian Bale in rumor.

At one point, The Flash was to rewrite the entire timeline, Flashpoint-style, establishing a new universe. Then came Ezra Miller’s scandals, executive reshuffling, and James Gunn’s new DCU. By the time The Flash hit theaters, most of its cameos (including Cavill and Gadot) were cut. The reset button had been pressed, but with no plan for what came after.

Even the Green Lantern Corps series — once set to star John Stewart and Hal Jordan — vanished into vapor. A decade of teases, zero payoff. In 2023, Gunn finally confirmed it would be reborn as Lanterns, a grounded HBO series starring both characters in a detective narrative.

It was fitting: even the Lanterns were lost in the dark.

The Heroes We Never Met — A Roll Call of the Forgotten

• Cyborg (solo film) — Ray Fisher’s promised standalone project, canceled after his fallout with WB over Whedon and studio misconduct.

• The Trench — James Wan’s proposed horror spinoff from Aquaman, later revealed to be secretly tied to a Black Manta origin movie.

• Man of Steel 2 — Henry Cavill’s long-rumored sequel; officially dead after James Gunn’s reboot announcement.

• Nightwing — Chris McKay (The Lego Batman Movie) was attached, script in progress, quietly shelved.

• Plastic Man — A gender-swapped, comedic adaptation written by Birds of Prey’s screenwriter, abandoned post-merger.

• Justice League Dark — Guillermo del Toro’s dream ensemble (featuring Constantine, Swamp Thing, and Zatanna), reworked multiple times before being scrapped and later revived under Gunn’s “Creature Commandos” banner.

Each project a different universe — each one snuffed out by a new CEO, a changing strategy, or simple fear.

XIV. Epilogue: Ashes of Olympus — The Elegy of the DCEU

There is a peculiar beauty in ruins.The DC Extended Universe was never perfect, never consistent, never complete. It was a cathedral built on shifting ground — its foundations laid in genius and arrogance, in heartbreak and hope. Its architects were poets with cameras and titans in suits, each pulling at the same tapestry until it both unraveled and shimmered.

It began, as all myths do, with shadows and fire.

Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins lit a match in the dark, proving that capes could coexist with craft.

Then came Zack Snyder, painting gods as men and men as metaphors — a filmmaker who saw comic panels as scripture. His Man of Steel was not about saving the world, but bearing its weight. Batman v Superman dared to ask if we should worship our saviors at all.

And for a fleeting moment, the DCEU reached Olympus.Wonder Woman stood as hope incarnate, a candle in wartime fog. Aquaman dove into delirious wonder, Shazam! into innocence. Joker and The Batman — though not of the same bloodline — proved that DC’s spirit could splinter into art. There were triumphs of vision, courage, and sincerity.

But every pantheon carries its curse.Justice League was that curse — a tragedy not of fiction, but of management. Snyder’s grief met the studio’s panic, and the result was a film with two souls and no heartbeat. The fallout exposed more than creative fractures; it revealed the machinery of modern myth-making itself. Actors became advocates, fans became armies, and the line between justice and obsession blurred.

Still, the gods refused to die.Through hashtags and heartbreak, through scandals and reshoots, the Snyder Cut emerged — a resurrection that felt both biblical and bittersweet. For a few hours, the DCEU’s story looped back into coherence, and audiences glimpsed what might have been.

Then came the flood: mergers, firings, cancellations.A Batgirl buried alive for tax relief. A Superman stripped of his cape. A Black Adam who promised to change the hierarchy, only to vanish into corporate fog. Warner Bros. became a revolving door of visionaries and executives, each promising a future that dissolved before it began.

The DCEU’s history became a litany of paradoxes — every success shadowed by a failure, every failure redeemed by a spark of brilliance. It was chaos and art intertwined, the most human kind of myth: ambitious, flawed, fleeting.

And yet, from the rubble, something stirs.

James Gunn’s Superman (2025) does not rise from ashes so much as grow from them. It carries no bitterness, no burden of reclamation. It seeks not to correct the past, but to honor it — to see these fallen titans as lessons, not mistakes.

Where Snyder’s gods towered above man, Gunn’s promise is that they will walk beside us.

His DCU begins not with vengeance, but with warmth — a mythology rebuilt from kindness.

Because perhaps that is the final lesson of the DCEU: that even gods must learn to be human.

The story of the DC Extended Universe is not a failure. It is a poem written across decades of cinema — one that bled, broke, and burned, but never stopped reaching. Like the heroes it birthed, it fell not for lack of strength, but for daring to chase the impossible dream: to unite gods, monsters, and mortals in one mythic heartbeat.

And though its era ends, the legend endures —in the echoes of Snyder’s hymns, in Nolan’s discipline, in Patty Jenkins’ courage, in the laughter of Shazam! and the tears of Joker.

A new dawn comes.And somewhere, among the shattered pantheon, Superman smiles again — not as a savior, but as a symbol of the hope that even broken worlds can begin anew.

Bibliography

Ayer, D. (Director). (2016). Suicide Squad [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.

Black Adam’s theatrical run may lose Warner Bros. up to $100 million. (2023, March 9). CBR. Retrieved from https://www.cbr.com/black-adam-box-office-may-lose-warner-bros-discovery-millions/ CBR

Collier, S. (2023, March 21). How Dwayne Johnson kneecapped ‘Black Adam’ and ‘Shazam! Fury of the Gods’ while trying to take over DC. TheWrap / Reddit summary. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/comments/11xg6nh … Reddit

DuVernay, A. (Director). (Development canceled). New Gods [Unproduced film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.El Arbi, A., & Fallah, B. (Directors). (Canceled). Batgirl [Unreleased film]. Warner Bros. Discovery.Fisher, R. (2020, July 1). Ray Fisher accuses Joss Whedon of ‘abusive’ conduct during Justice League reshoots. SYFY WIRE. Retrieved from https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/ray-fisher-joss-whedon-accusation-justice-league SYFY

Gunn, J., & Safran, P. (2022, October 25). James Gunn and Peter Safran named Co-Chairmen and CEOs of DC Studios. Warner Bros. Discovery Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.wbd.com/james-gunn-and-peter-safran-named-co-chairmen-and-ceos-of-dc-studios/ Warner Bros. Discovery

Gunn, J. (Director). (2021). The Suicide Squad [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Gunn, J. (Director). (2025). Superman [Film]. DC Studios.

How Dwayne Johnson’s “Black Adam” became huge home-video hit despite box-office failure. (2023, Apr. 11). CBR. Retrieved from https://www.cbr.com/black-adam-home-video-2023-box-office-failure/ CBR

James Gunn, Peter Safran to lead DC movies, TV division at Warner Bros. (2022, Oct. 25). CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/25/james-gunn-peter-safran-named-new-heads-of-warner-bros-dc-studios.html CNBC

Jenkins, P. (Director). (2017). Wonder Woman [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Jenkins, P. (Director). (2020). Wonder Woman 1984 [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures / HBO Max.Johnson, D. (Producer/Star). (2022). Black Adam [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Nolan, C. (Director). (2005). Batman Begins [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Nolan, C. (Director). (2008). The Dark Knight [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Nolan, C. (Director). (2012). The Dark Knight Rises [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Phillips, T. (Director). (2019). Joker [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Reeves, M. (Director). (2022). The Batman [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Sandberg, D. F. (Director). (2019). Shazam! [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Sandberg, D. F. (Director). (2023). Shazam! Fury of the Gods [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Singer, B. (2025, Aug. 27). Brad Singer named finance chief of post-split Warner Bros. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/brad-singer-named-finance-chief-post-split-warner-bros-2025-08-27/ Reuters

Snyder, Z. (Director). (2013). Man of Steel [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Snyder, Z. (Director). (2016). Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Snyder, Z. (Director). (2017). Justice League [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.Snyder, Z. (Director). (2021). Zack Snyder’s Justice League [Film]. HBO Max / Warner Bros. Pictures.“‘Justice League’ on-set investigation concluded after Ray Fisher complaints.” (2020, December 14). NME. Retrieved from https://www.nme.com/news/film/justice-league-on-set-investigation-concluded-after-ray-fisher-complaints-2838337 NME

Warner Bros. Discovery to split into two companies, dividing cable and streaming services. (2025, June 9). AP News. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/1cdafec11e6cb542ca644e20dd29e826 AP News

Warner Bros. Discovery. (n.d.). Peter Safran — Co-Chairman & Co-CEO, DC Studios [Profile]. Retrieved from https://www.wbd.com/leadership/peter-safran/ Warner Bros. Discovery

WarnerMedia explores sale amid industry shake-up, raising questions for DC’s future. (2025, Oct. 21). Daily Planet (DC Fan Site). Retrieved from https://dailyplanetdc.com/2025/10/21/warner-bros-explores-sale-amid-industry-shake-up-raising-questions-for-dcs-future/ dailyplanetdc.com

Warner, S. (2020, July 2). Ray Fisher: Joss Whedon’s behaviour on Justice League set was abusive and unprofessional. The Indian Express. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/hollywood/ray-fisher-joss-whedon-behaviour-on-justice-league-set-was-abusive-unprofessional-6486252/ The Indian Express“James Gunn, Peter Safran Named Heads of DC Studios.” (2023, March 12). Collider. Retrieved from https://www.collider.com/james-gunn-peter-safran-dc-studios-warner-bros/ Collider

“James Gunn’s ‘Superman’ soars, earning over $200 million worldwide during its opening weekend.” (2025, July 13). Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/james-gunn-superman-box-office-numbers-opening-weekend-2025-7 Business Insider

Smith, J. (2022). “Black Adam loses millions for Warner Bros Discovery.” Small-Screen.co.uk. Retrieved from https://www.small-screen.co.uk/black-adam-lost-millions-warner-bros/ small-screen.co.uk